Self-Assessment Study and External Assessors Reports Preparation - English
GENERAL GUIDELINES
1.
Writing assessment reports in English.
2.
Submitting (5) copies of each report: (5)
e-copies in DVD and other (5) print ones.
3.
Organizing/showing
reports in the order shown in this appendix.
4.
Submitting all documents and evidences of
self-assessment at the time of submitting the assessment to the council. When
the required documents are unavailable, the self-assessment preparation committee
is required to write ''unavailable'' in front of the related item.
5.
It is possible to add documents/evidences in support
of the institution of higher education or other than those mentioned in the
self-assessment requirements.
Note: After
submitting self-assessment reports to the Council for Accreditation and Quality
Assurance of Higher Education, related medical schools or assessors shall never
take them back again.
SELF-ASSESSMENT STUDY GUIDELINES
Introduction
Accreditation and
quality assurance procedures aim to: ensure that medical schools meet
conditions of quality and accreditation standards and develop procedures of self-assessment
study at medical schools. Because a self-assessment report at medical schools
is a base for external assessment, representatives of administration, students,
faculty
members, etc. should
participate in self-assessment study and focus on:
1.
collecting and analyzing data
about the medical school.
2.
defining strengths,
weaknesses, and current problems.
3.
defining strategies for
reinforcing strengths and solving weaknesses and problems.
Components of Self-Study
Assessment Report
A medical school
must submit its self-assessment study report of (100) pages in maximum
supported with an approval document signed by the rector of the related
university confirming that he/she knows about writing this report. The report
should involve the following:
1.
Cover.
2.
List of contents.
3.
One-page overview on higher
education institution and the related medical school supported with statistics.
4.
Brief description of
self-study preparation (2-3 pages) showing the way different parties (i.e.
academic leadership, administrative staff, faculty members, students,
graduates) cooperate in the preparation process.
5.
General information on the
medical school (5 pages): date of establishment to present, main areas of
self-study assessment results focusing on school institutional structure,
academic programme, and financial resources.
6.
The body of report forms the
core report. It is composed of (9) parts; each part covers an accreditation
standard of medical schools and shows how a medical school achieves it
supported with documents and evidences as will be shown in detail later. Each
part seeks to clearly and directly respond to questions of each item in
each standard (indicators) as shown in instructions attached. This in turn
helps the self-assessment study committee and other sub-committees to be aware
of standards, and data gathering, and evidences required to prove the school
achievement of each standard. In this relation, all answers must be listed
after each standard. Moreover, such answers must be based on evidences, related
interpretations, references to other parts in the report, and clear links to
supporting documents introduced to identify strengths, weaknesses, and
strategies for future treatment of each filed.
7. Conclusion
It involves an important summary of what is said in all report parts to
show:
·
school strengths, weaknesses,
needs and strategies for development and
sustainment.
·
any changes and developments
from the previous assessment course, if any.
·
any local, national, and
international changes that could create problems for the higher education institution.
·
any other future suggestions.
8. Appendices
Appendices involve evident documents classified based
on standards.
A medical school must prepare a room for other
evidences, classified based on standards, that cannot be shown in the
report due to their big sizes but they are important for indicating academic
accreditation standards achievement. Moreover, the show-room must be prepared
with sufficient equipment for the assessment team and equipped with a computer,
printer with Net facility.
MEDICAL SCHOOL GENERAL INFORMATION
University:
School:
Date of establishment:
Total number of students:
Number of students in every year:
1st Year |
2nd
Year |
3rd
Year |
4th
Year |
5th Year |
6th Year |
7th Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of batches graduated:
Number of faculty members listed according to
programme and major:
Basic Medical Sciences |
Behavioral and Social
Sciences |
Clinical
Sciences |
Clinical
Training |
|
|
|
|
Address:
Website:
Coordinator name, mobile, email:
Standard One: Mission and Learning Outcomes
1.1 School Mission
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this sub-standard:
1.
How is the programme/school mission stated?
Please, attach a copy.
2.
How does the school make the programme
mission known to teaching and administrative staffs, students, health sector, it
serves, and community as a whole?
3.
Which part of the programme mission covers
local community and health sector needs?
4.
How does the programme mission reflect social
accountability, research, society service, and postgraduate students
qualification? List mission components that address this point.
5.
Which part of the programme mission covers
research and global health cases? List mission components that address this
point.
6.
Does the school dean and other concerned persons
participate in stating the programme mission, expected learning outcomes, and
programme aims? How?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators |
Indicator
Availability Extent |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
1.1.1A |
The school has stated
its mission clearly. |
|
|
|
|
1.1.2A |
The school has made its
mission known to its leadership, academic
and administrative staffs, students, beneficiaries, and health sector, it
serves. |
|
|
|
|
1.1.3A
1.1.4A
|
In its mission, the
school has outlined the aims of its academic programme and educational
strategy which leads to qualifying a doctor to be: -
competent at a basic level with
emphasis on priority health problems of Yemen. -
of basic knowledge
and skills that qualify him/her to any future medical job in any branch of
medicine. |
|
|
|
|
1.1.5A
1.1.6A
1.1.7A
|
-
capable of undertaking the roles
of doctors as defined by the health sector in Yemen. -
able to pursue postgraduate
medical education. -
committed to life-long learning. |
|
|
|
|
1.1.8A
|
The school has encompassed in its mission
the community, health needs, health care delivery system needs, and other
aspects of social accountability taking into consideration the cultural and
social contexts in Yemen. |
|
|
|
|
1.1.1Q |
The school encompasses
in its mission medical research attainment. |
|
|
|
|
1.1.2Q |
The school encompasses
in its mission aspects of global health. |
|
|
|
|
1.2 Institution
Autonomy and Academic Freedom
·
A guiding question to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1. Does the
school have written policies to describe employees' roles and ensure freedom
of word, research, and publication? Please, attach a copy.
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators |
Indicator
Availability Extent |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
1.2.1A |
The school is autonomous so
as to formulate and
implement policies for which its faculty members and administration are responsible, especially in: - designing the
curriculum/programme. |
|
|
|
|
1.2.2A |
- using
the allocated resources necessary for implementation of the curriculum/academic programme. |
|
|
|
|
1.1.1Q |
The school is autonomous so
as to formulate and
implement policies for which its faculty members and administration are responsible, especially in: designing the
curriculum/programme.- |
|
|
|
|
1.1.2Q |
using the allocated resources necessary for implementation of the
curriculum/academic
programme |
|
|
|
|
1.3 Learning Outcomes
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1.
How are intended learning outcomes
developed?
2.
How do intended learning outcomes differ
from or come in line with NARS?
3.
Describe the intended learning outcomes and
student general competencies (knowledge, skills, and attitudes) when they
graduate. Please, attach a copy of document.
2. How does the
school make intended learning outcomes known and accessible to students, health
sector, it serves, and community as a whole?
4.
How areintended learning outcomes linked to current needs
of the community where students will work in?
5.
What are the intended learning outcomes that cover research and global health cases?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators |
Indicator
Availability Extent |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
1.3.1A |
The school has defined the intended learning outcomes that
students must exhibit upon graduation in relation to their: -
achievements at a basic
level regarding knowledge, skills, and attitudes covering at least those
listed in Yemeni National Academic Reference Standards (NARS) for medicine. |
|
|
|
|
1.3.2A |
-
basic knowledge and
skills that qualify them for any future
career in any branch of medicine |
|
|
|
|
1.3.3A |
-
future roles in the health sector. |
|
|
|
|
1.3.4A |
-
subsequent
postgraduate training; |
|
|
|
|
1.3.5A |
-
commitment to skills in life-long learning; |
|
|
|
|
1.3.6A |
-
ability to meet health needs of the community, the needs of the health care
delivery system and other aspects of social accountability taking into
account the socio-cultural norms of Yemen. |
|
|
|
|
1.3.7A |
The school has
ensured appropriate student conduct with respect to fellow students, faculty
members, other health care personnel, patients and their relatives. |
|
|
|
|
1.3.8A |
The
school has made intended learning outcomes publicly known. |
|
|
|
|
1.3.1Q |
The
school has specified and co-ordinated linkage of acquired learning outcomes
by graduation with acquired outcomes in postgraduate training. |
|
|
|
|
1.3.2Q |
The
school has specified intended outcomes of student engagement in medical
research and its relevance to community health problems in Yemen |
|
|
|
|
1.3.3Q |
The
school has drawn attention to global health related intended outcomes. |
|
|
|
|
1.4Participation in Stating Mission and Learning Outcomes
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1. How
does mission ensure participation of principal
stakeholders (i.e. dean, school council, curriculum committee,
representatives of academic and administrative cadres, representatives of
students, university leadership, Ministry of Health, and medical council) in formulating the mission and intended learning outcomes?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators |
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
1.4.1A |
The school has
ensured that its principal stakeholders (i.e. dean, school
council, curriculum committee, representatives of academic and administrative
cadres, representatives of students, university leadership, Ministry of
Health, and medical council) participate
in formulating the mission and intended learning outcomes. |
|
|
|
|
1.4.1Q |
The school has
ensured that the formulation of its mission and intended learning outcomes is
based also on input from other stakeholders(i.e. representatives of other
medical professions, patients, society, users of health
care delivery systems). |
|
|
|
|
Standard Two: Academic Programme
2.1 Programme Framework
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1. What theoretical
principles that address formulation of curriculum and instruction methods?
2. How do curriculum
and instruction methods stimulate students to be active in learning process?
3. How does school curriculum
ensure student:
a. motive learning techniques and interactive learning methods?
b. participation in special learning process?
c. equality principle (i.e. gender, geography, economic level, etc.)?
d. preparation
for life-long learning?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
2.1.1A |
The school has defined the curriculum clearly. |
|
|
|
|
2.1.2A |
The school has used a curriculum and
instructional/learning methods that stimulate, prepared and supported
students to participate in their learning process |
|
|
|
|
2.1.3A |
The school has ensured that the curriculum is
delivered in accordance with principles of equality(i.e. gender, geography,
economic level, etc.). |
|
|
|
|
2.1.1Q |
The school has ensured that the
curriculum prepares the students for life-long
learning. |
|
|
|
|
2.2 Scientific Methods
·
A guiding question to respond
to achievement indicators of this sub-standard:
1.
Which curriculum components cultivate principles of
scientific methods and evidence-based medicine in students' minds and qualify them for
analytical and critical thinking?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Extent |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
2.2.1A |
In all programme stages, the school has taught:
- principles and
scientific methods including analytical and critical thinking; |
|
|
|
|
2.2.2A |
- medical
research methods. |
|
|
|
|
2.2.3A |
- evidence-based
medicine. |
|
|
|
|
2.2.1Q |
The school included
elements of medical research in curriculum. |
|
|
|
|
2.3 Basic Scientific Sciences
·
A guiding question to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1.
How
are medical sciences contributions
incorporated in curriculum to create the required basic scientific
knowledge with students to attain and apply clinical and medical sciences in
line with scientific, technological and clinical development?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
2.3.1A |
A medical school has identified
and incorporated the contributions of the medical sciences in the curriculum
to create understanding of: - scientific
knowledge, principles, and skills fundamental to acquiring and applying the
clinical science. |
|
|
|
|
2.3.2A |
- concepts and
methods fundamental to acquiring and applying clinical sciences. |
|
|
|
|
2.3.1Q |
The school has
adjusted and modified the contributions of medical science in line with
scientific, technological and clinical development. |
|
|
|
|
2.3.2Q |
The school has adjusted and modified the
contributions of medical science in line with current and anticipated needs
of the society and the health care system in Yemen. |
|
|
|
|
2.4 Behavioral and Social Sciences and Medical
Ethics
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1. What are the
elements of basic biomedical sciences, behavioral and social sciences, medicine
ethics, and clinical sciences incorporated in the curriculum?
2. How are behavioral and
social sciences such as society medicine, psychology, sociology and medical
statistics incorporated in the curriculum?
3. How are the
contributions of medical ethics, medical jurisprudence (i.e. laws, decisions and service delivery
responsibilities) identified and incorporated in the curriculum?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
2.4.1A 2.4.2A |
In the curriculum, the school has identified and incorporated the contributions of the: - behavioral; - social sciences such as society medicine,
psychology, sociology and medical statistics; |
|
|
|
|
2.4.3A 2.4.4A |
- medical ethics; - medical jurisprudence (i.e. laws, decisions and service delivery
responsibilities). |
|
|
|
|
2.4.1Q |
The school has adjusted and modified the contributions of behavioral
and social science, medical ethics, and the legal aspects in line withscientific, technological and clinical developments. |
|
|
|
|
2.4.2Q |
The school has adjusted and modified the contributions of behavioral
and social science, medical ethics, and the legal aspects in line with
current and anticipated needs of the society and the health care system in
Yemen. |
|
|
|
|
2.4.3Q |
The school has adjusted and modified the contributions of behavioral
and social science, medical ethics, and the legal aspects in line with
changing demographic and cultural contexts. |
|
|
|
|
2.5 Clinical
Sciences and Skills
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this sub-standard:
1. Are clinical sciences contributions
identified and incorporated in curriculum to ensure student:
a.
sufficient knowledge and clinical professional skills
to assume appropriate responsibility after graduation?
b.
spending of a reasonable part of curriculum in a planned
contact with patients concerning health facilities? Explain.
c.
spending of a reasonable part of curriculum in a planned
contact with patients concerning clinical settings? Explain.
2. Are clinical sciences contributions identified
and incorporated in curriculum to ensure student:
a. reinforcement for experience health
promotion and preventive medicine? Explain.
b. specification of time spent in training in
major clinical disciplines? Explain.
c. organization of clinical training paying
attention to patient safety? Explain.
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
2.5.1A |
The school has identified and incorporated the contributions of the clinical sciences
to ensure that students: - acquire sufficient knowledge and clinical
and professional skills to assume appropriate responsibility after graduation; |
|
|
|
|
2.5.2A |
- spend a reasonable part of the
curriculum in planned contact with patients in relevant clinical settings; |
|
|
|
|
2.5.3A |
- experience health promotion and
preventive medicine; |
|
|
` |
|
2.5.4A |
-specify the amount of time spent in
training in major clinical disciplines |
|
|
|
|
2.5.5A |
- organize clinical training with
appropriate attention to patient safety. |
|
|
|
|
2.5.1Q |
The school has adjusted and modified the contributions of the
clinical sciences to thescientific,
technological and clinical developments. |
|
|
|
|
2.5.2Q |
The school has adjusted and modified the contributions
of the clinical sciences to the current and anticipated needs of the society
and the health care system in Yemen. |
|
|
|
|
2.5.3Q |
The school has ensured that every student
has early patient contact gradually including participation in patient care. |
|
|
|
|
2.5.4Q |
The medical school has structured the different components of clinical
skills training according to the stage of the study programme. |
|
|
|
|
2.6 Programme Structure, Components and Duration
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1. How are specification, period and
sequence of courses designed to ensure appropriate coordination between basic
medical, behavioural, social and clinical sciences?
2. What are the
policies used to address horizontal and
vertical integration of the clinical sciences in programme?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
2.6.1A
|
The school has described the
content, extent and sequencing of courses and other curricular elements to
ensure appropriate coordination between basic medical, behavioural and social
and clinical sciences. |
|
|
|
|
2.6.1Q |
Concerning curricula, a medical schoolhasensured horizontal integration of associated sciences,
disciplines and subjects in relation. |
|
|
|
|
2.6.2Q |
The school has ensured vertical integration of the clinical
sciences with the basic biomedical and the behavioural and social sciences |
|
|
` |
|
2.6.3Q |
The school has allowed optional (elective) content and define the
balance between the core and optional content as part of the educational
programme. |
|
|
|
|
2.6.4Q- |
The school has described the interface with complementary
medicine. |
|
|
|
|
2.7 Programme Management
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1. Does the school have a curriculum committee, under the governance of its deanery, responsible
for planning and implementing curriculum to achieve intended learning outcomes?
Mention committee structure.
2. How does the school ensure
representation of its academic cadre and students in the curriculum committee?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
2.7.1A |
The school has
a curriculum committee, under the governance of the academic leadership (the
dean),responsible for planning and
implementing the curriculum to achieve the intended learning outcomes. |
|
|
|
|
2.7.2A |
A medical
school has ensured representation of the academic cadre and students in the
curriculum committee. |
|
|
|
|
2.7.1Q |
Through its
curriculum committee, the school has planned and implemented innovations in
the curriculum. |
|
|
` |
|
2.8 Linkage
with Medical Practice with Health Sector
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1.
Is there an operational linkage between educational
programme and subsequent stages of education or practice after graduation and labor market? Explain.
2.
Have you ensured that
the curriculum committee intends to seek inputs from environment in which graduates will be expected to
work, and adjust the programme accordingly considering both interactions and opinions of stakeholders and community? Mention them.
3.
What mechanisms followed to get and use comments from
local community and community as a whole? What is the result of these comments?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
2.8.1A |
The school has ensured operational linkage between the
educational programme and the subsequent stages of education or practice
after graduation and labor
market. |
|
|
|
|
2.8.1Q |
The school has ensured that the curriculum committee intends to seek inputs from the environment in which graduates
will be expected to work, and modifies the programme accordingly (i.e. labor market needs). |
|
|
|
|
2.8.2Q |
The medical school has considered
programme modification in response to interactions and opinions of the
stakeholders and community. |
|
|
` |
|
Standard Three: Assessment of Students
3.1 Assessment Techniques
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1.
Which unit, office, or
administration is responsible
for assessment at the school?
2.
How does the school ensure validity and reliability of
assessment techniques?
3.
How do assessment practices come in line with intended
learning outcomes and instruction methods?
4.
To what extent do all curriculum elements receive an
integrative assessment? How?
5.
Can assessment techniques help in identifying whether
or not intended learning outcomes are achieved? How?
6.
How can principles, methods and practices,
used for assessing students, be published?
7.
How are a wide range
of assessments, that cover knowledge, skills and setting pass marks,used?
8.
Does the school use a system
for student appeal to:
a.
assess and document reliability
and validity of assessment techniques through a special committee? Mention the
mechanism used?
b.
Incorporate new
assessment methods where appropriate? Provide examples.
c.
encourage the use of
external examiners?
Provide examples.
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
3.1.1A |
The school has defined, stated and published the principles, methods and practices
used for assessment of its students, including the criteria for setting pass
marks, grade boundaries and number of allowed retakes. |
|
|
|
|
3.1.2A |
The school has ensured that assessments cover knowledge, skills and
attitudes in accordance with the Yemeni NARS. |
|
|
|
|
3.1.3A |
The school has a wide range of assessment techniques and forms as
needed. |
|
|
` |
|
3.1.4A |
The school has ensured that the assessments avoid the conflict of
interest. |
|
|
|
|
3.1.5A |
The school has ensured that the assessments are open to scrutiny by external
experts. |
|
|
|
|
3.1.6A |
The school has used a system of appeal of assessment results. |
|
|
|
|
3.1.1Q |
The school has ensured that the curriculum committee intends to evaluate
and document the reliability and validity of assessment methods through committees
in relation. |
|
|
|
|
3.1.2Q |
The school has incorporated new assessment methods where appropriate |
|
|
|
|
3.1.3Q |
The school has encouraged the use of external examiners. |
|
|
|
|
3.2 Relation between Learning and Assessment
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1.
Does the school ensure timely assessment results and feedback to students? Explain.
2.
What are the documents that show timely results announcement mechanism?
3.
What mechanism does the school use to provide feedback to students?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
3.2.1A- |
The school has
used the principles, techniques, and practice of assessment that: are clearly compatible with intended learning outcomes and
instructional methods. |
|
|
|
|
3.2.2A |
The school has ensured that the intended learning outcomes are
met by the students. |
|
|
|
|
3.2.3A |
The school has promoted student learning. |
|
|
` |
|
3.2.4A |
The school has provided an appropriate balance of formative and
summative assessment to guide both learning and decisions about academic
progress (i.e. students' learning advancement). |
|
|
|
|
3.2.1Q |
The school has adjusted the number and nature of examinations of
curricular elements to encourage both acquisition of the knowledge base and
integrated learning. |
|
|
|
|
3.2.2Q |
The school has ensured timely, specific, constructive and fair
feedback to students on basis of assessment results.
|
|
|
|
|
Standard Four: Students
4.1 Admission Policy and Selection
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1.
Does the school state and
implement an admission
policy based on principles of objectivity, including a clear statement on the
way students get selected? Summarize
this policy.
2.
What are the criteria
of student selection? List them.
3.
Which office or unit
at the school responsible for student admission?
4.
What are the admission methods used? List
them.
5.
How is the school size of student intake defined?
6.
Does the school havea policy for disabled student admissionand
implement a student transfer policy from other programmes and national and
international medical schools? What are these policies?
7.
How does the school show the
relationship between student admission and selection and its mission, programme,
desired qualities of graduates periodical review and assessment of admission
policy, and appeal policy for admission decisions? Explain.
8.
What are the required documents for registration and
admission?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
4.1.1A |
The school has
stated and implemented an admission policy based on principles of objectivity, including a
clear statement on the process of selection of students. |
|
|
|
|
4.1.2A |
The school has a policy, and gets
implemented it, for disabled students admission. |
|
|
|
|
4.1.3A |
The school has a policy, and gets
implemented it, for student transfer from other national and
international medical schools. |
|
|
` |
|
4.1.1Q- |
The school has stated the relationship between selection and the
mission of the school, the educational programme and desired qualities of
graduates. |
|
|
|
|
4.1.2Q |
The school has periodically reviewed and assessed the admission
policy. |
|
|
|
|
4.1.3Q |
The school has used a system for appeal of admission decisions. |
|
|
|
|
4.2
Student Intake
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1.
Does the schooldefine the size of student intake and relate it to its capacity at
all stages of programme and departments? Provide examples.
2.
Does the school hold workshops in consultation with other stakeholders to
periodically review the size of student intake and regulate it, if needed,
to meet society health needs? Provide examples.
3.
Is there any mechanism used for defining the size of student intake? Summarize it.
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
4.2.1A |
The school has defined the
size of student intake and relate it to its capacity at all stages of the
programme and departments.
|
|
|
|
|
4.2.1Q |
The school has
periodically reviewed the size and nature of student intake in consultation
with other stakeholders and regulate it to meet the health needs of the
society. |
|
|
|
|
4.3 Student Counseling
and Support
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this sub-standard:
1. Does
the school have an academic counselling system for its students? Comment briefly.
2. Does
the l school offer a programme for student support to address their social,
financial and personal needs? Comment
briefly.
3.
Does the school
allocate resources for student support such as providing academic counseling, which is based on
monitoring of student progress, and academic counseling that includes
career guidance and planning? Comment
briefly.
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
4.3.1A |
The school has a
system for academic counselling of its students. |
|
|
|
|
4.3.2A |
The school has
offered a programme of student support, addressing social, financial and
personal needs. |
|
|
|
|
4.3.3A |
The school has allocated
resources for student support; |
|
|
|
|
4.3.4A |
The school has
ensured confidentiality in relation to counseling and support. |
|
|
|
|
4.3.1Q |
The school has
provided academic counseling that is based on monitoring of student progress. |
|
|
|
|
4.3.2Q |
The school has
provided academic counseling that includes career guidance and planning. |
|
|
|
|
4.4
Student Representation
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1.
Does the school have a clear policy on student representation and appropriate
participation instating
mission, designing, managing, and assessing programme and other matters
relevant to students?
2.
Does the school use special techniques for
promoting and facilitating student activities?Comment briefly.
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable
|
Notes
|
||
4.4.1A |
The l school has formulated
and implemented a policy on student representation and appropriate
participation in: - stating mission. |
|
|
|
|
4.4.2A |
- designing academic programme; |
|
|
|
|
4.4.3A |
- managing the programme; |
|
|
|
|
4.4.4A |
- evaluating the programme |
|
|
|
|
4.4.5A |
- other matters relevant to students. |
|
|
|
|
4.4.1Q |
- encourage and facilitate student activities. |
|
|
|
|
Standard Five:
Academic Staff
5.1 Recruitment
and Selection Policy
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1. What
policies does the school use to ensure recruitment to be in balance with the
required teaching skills to introduce the programme with all its components of
basic medical sciences, behavioural and social sciences and clinical sciences?
2. What policy does
the school useto ensure
that the contributions of faculty members in teaching, research, and service
are recognized to be adequately rewarded?
3. What is the
proportion of faculty members to students in each curriculum component (i.e.
basic medical sciences, behavioural and social sciences, and clinical
training)?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
5.1.1A |
The school has formulated and implemented a staff
recruitment and selection policy which has: - outline the type, responsibilities and balance of
faculty members of the basic medical sciences, the behavioural and social
sciences and the clinical sciences required to deliver the curriculum
adequately, including the balance between medical and non-medical faculty
members, the balance between full-time and part-time faculty members, and the
balance between academic and non-academic staff. |
|
|
|
|
5.1.2A |
- address criteria for scientific,
educational and clinical merit, including the balance between teachings,
research and service functions.
|
|
|
|
|
5.1.3A |
- specify and monitor the responsibilities
of its faculty members of the basic medical sciences, the behavioural and
social sciences and the clinical sciences. |
|
|
|
|
5.1.4A |
- have effective selection procedure that is fair, rigorous and
transparent to ensure that the best candidates for the job are selected. |
|
|
|
|
5.1.1Q |
The school has involved in its
policy for staff recruitment and selection the criterion of: its mission,
including significant local issues. |
|
|
|
|
5.1.2Q |
The school has involved in its policy for staff recruitment and
selection the criterion of economic considerations. |
|
|
|
|
5.2 Activity and Development of Academic Staff
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1. What
considerations made by the school when stating and implementing the policy of
activities and developments of its academic and administrative cadres?
2. What are the
implemented professional development programmes for faculty members to enable them to
develop their skills and assess their teaching performance?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Assessment
Indicators |
Degree
of IndicatorAvailability |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
5.2.1A |
The medical school has formulated
and implemented a staff activity and development policy which allow a balance of capacity between teaching, research and
society service. |
|
|
|
|
5.2.2A |
The school has ensured recognition of meritorious academic
activities, with appropriate emphasis on teaching, research and society
service. |
|
|
|
|
5.2.3A |
The school has ensured that clinical service functions and
research are used in teaching and learning. |
|
|
|
|
5.2.4A |
The school has ensured sufficient knowledge by individual staff
members of the total curriculum. |
|
|
|
|
5.2.5A |
The school has included teacher training, development, support
and appraisal. |
|
|
|
|
5.2.1Q |
The school has ensured
teacher-student ratios relevant to the various curricular components. |
|
|
|
|
5.2.2Q |
The school has designed and implemented a staff promotion
policy. |
|
|
|
|
Standard Six: Learning Resources
6.1 Physical Facilities
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1. Does the school have sufficient
physical facilities for faculty members and students to
ensure introducing curriculum adequately?Explain.
2. Does the school ensure a safe learning
environment for faculty members, students, and
patients with their relatives? Explain.
3. What is the extent of updating and
modifying physical facilities to match developments in educational practices?
4. How does the school
review the extent of educational resources sufficiency? What is the result of
this review?
5. How does the school
review the extent of facilities and patients sufficiency for clinical teaching?
What is the result of this review?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
6.1.1A |
The school has sufficient physical facilities for staff and
students to ensure that the curriculum
can be delivered adequately. |
|
|
|
|
6.1.2A |
The school has ensured a safe learning environment for staff,
students, patients and their relatives. |
|
|
|
|
6.1.1Q |
The school has improved the learning environment by regularly
updating and modifying or extending the physical facilities to match
developments in educational practices |
|
|
|
|
6.2
Clinical Training Resources
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this sub-standard:
1.
Does the school have sufficient physical facilities for patients
(number and categories)?
2. What is the extent of sufficiency and
competency of clinical training facilities?
3. What is the extent
of commitment to supervision of
clinical practice?
4. Does the school
assess, adapt and improve facilities for
clinical training to meet the needs of population, it serves? Comment briefly.
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
6.2.1A |
The school has ensured
necessary resources for
giving the students
adequate clinical experience, including sufficient: - number and categories of patients; |
|
|
|
|
6.2.2A |
- clinical training facilities; |
|
|
|
|
6.2.3A |
- supervision of their clinical practice. |
|
|
|
|
6.2.1Q |
The school has assessed, adapted and improved the facilities for
clinical training to meet the needs of the population it serves. |
|
|
|
|
6.3
Information Technology
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this sub-standard:
1.
Does the school formulate and implement a policy to address effective
and ethical use and evaluation of appropriate information and communication
technology? Comment briefly.
2.
Does the school ensure access to web-based or other electronic
media? Comment briefly.
3.
What is the extent of school commitment to enhance independent
learning? Explain.
4.
Is accessing
information easy?
Explain.
5.
How are patients
managed?
6.
Does the school work in health care delivery systems? Comment briefly.
7.
How does the school optimize student access to relevant patient
data and health care information systems?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
6.3.1A |
The school has formulated and implemented a policy which
addresses effective and ethical use and evaluation of appropriate information
and communication technology. |
|
|
|
|
6.3.2A |
The school has ensured access to web-based or other electronic
media. |
|
|
|
|
6.3.1Q |
The school has enabled
teachers and students
to use existing
and exploit appropriate new
information and communication
technology for: - independent learning; |
|
|
|
|
6.3.2Q |
- accessing information; |
|
|
|
|
6.3.3Q |
- managing patients; |
|
|
|
|
6.3.4Q |
-working in health care delivery systems; |
|
|
|
|
6.3.5Q |
- optimizing student access to relevant patient data and health
care information systems. |
|
|
|
|
6.4 Medical Research
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1.
How does the school use medical research as a basis for the educational
curricula?
2.
What
policies does the school use and implement to foster the relationship between
medical research and education?
3.
Does
the school specify research facilities and priorities? How?
4.
How does the school ensure interaction between medical research and
education concerning:
a. influences on current teaching?
b. encouragement and preparing students to be engaged in medical
research and professional development?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
6.4.1A |
The school has used medical research as a basis for the
educational curriculum.
|
|
|
|
|
6.4.2A |
The school has formulated and implemented a policy that fosters
the relationship between medical research
and education. |
|
|
|
|
6.4.3A |
The school has specified and described the research facilities
and priorities at the school. |
|
|
|
|
6.4.1Q- |
The school has ensured the interaction between medical research
and education concerning influences on current teaching. |
|
|
|
|
6.4.2Q |
The chool has ensured the interaction between medical research
and education concerning encouragement and preparing students to be engaged
in medical research and professional development. |
|
|
|
|
6.5
Educational Expertise
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1.
Is the school
able to access to educational expertise where required? How?
2.
Does the school formulate and implement a policy for the use of
educational expertise in curriculum development? Explain.
3.
Does the school formulate and implement a policy for the use of
educational expertise development of teaching and assessment techniques? Comment
briefly.
4.
Does the school demonstrate
evidence of the
use of in-house
or external educational
expertise in staff development? Comment briefly.
5.
Does the school pay attention to current expertise in educational assessment
and research in the medical education field? Explain.
6.
Does the school allow faculty members to pursue educational research interest?
Comment briefly.
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Degree
of Indicator Availability |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
6.5.1A |
The school has accessed to
educational expertise where required (i.e. assuring its need for faculty members). |
|
|
|
|
6.5.2A |
The school has formulated and
implemented a policy on the use of educational expertise in curriculum
development. |
|
|
|
|
6.5.3A |
The school has formulated a policy
on the use of educational expertise development of teaching and assessment
techniques. |
|
|
|
|
6.5.1Q |
The medical school has
demonstrated evidence of
the use of
in-house or external
educational expertise in
staff development. |
|
|
|
|
6.5.2Q |
The school has paid attention to
current expertise in educational evaluation and in research in the field of
medical education. |
|
|
|
|
6.5.3Q |
The school has allowed faculty members to pursue educational research interest. |
|
|
|
|
6.6.Educational
Exchange
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this sub-standard:
1. Does the school implement a policy for joint national and international
collaboration with other educational institutions, including staff and student mobility?
Comment briefly.
2. Does the school formulate and implement a policy for educational credits transfer
with other educational institutions? Explain.
3. Does the school facilitate regional and
international exchange of
staff and students
by providing appropriate resource? Comment briefly.
4. Does the school organize the exchange purposefully, taking into account the needs of faculty members and students, and respecting ethical principles? Comment briefly.
5.
Extent of Sub-Standard
Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable
|
Notes
|
||
6.6.1A |
The school has formulated a policy
for joint national and international collaboration with other educational
institutions, including staff and student mobility. |
|
|
|
|
6.6.2A |
The school has formulated a policy
for educational credits transfer with other educational institutions. |
|
|
|
|
6.6.1Q |
The school has facilitated regional
and international exchange
of staff and
students by providing
appropriate resources. |
|
|
|
|
6.6.2Q |
The school has organized the
exchange purposefully organized, taking into
account the needs
of staff and students, and respecting ethical
principles. |
|
|
|
|
Standard Seven:
Programme Evaluation
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1. How does the
school assess its programme?
2. Does the school have a plan of routine curriculum monitoring of processes and
outcomes? Comment briefly.
3. How does the
school involve principle stakeholders in programme assessment?
4. Does the
school establish and apply a mechanism for
programme assessment that addresses curriculum and its main components?
Explain.
5. Does the
school establish and apply a mechanism for programme
assessment that addresses student progress measurement? Comment briefly.
6. Does the
school establish and apply a mechanism for programme
assessment that identifies and addresses concerns? Comment briefly.
7. Does the
school use the assessment results to
develop the curriculum? Explain.
8. Does the
school periodically assess programme by comprehensively
addressing:
a. learning process context? Comment briefly.
b. curriculum components? Comment
briefly.
c. long-term acquired outcomes? Comment
briefly.
d. social accountability Comment
briefly.
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
7.1.1A |
The school has a plan of routine
curriculum monitoring of processes and outcomes. |
|
|
|
|
7.1.2A |
The school has established and applied
a mechanism for programme evaluation that addresses the curriculum and its
main components. |
|
|
|
|
7.1.3A |
The school has established and
applied a mechanism for programme evaluation that addresses student progress measurement. |
|
|
|
|
7.1.4A |
The school has established and
applied a mechanism for programme evaluation that identifies and addresses
concerns. |
|
|
|
|
7.1.5A |
The school has ensured that the
results of evaluation develop the curriculum. |
|
|
|
|
7.1.1Q |
The school has periodically assessed
the programme by comprehensively addressing the context of the educational
process. |
|
|
|
|
7.1.2Q |
The school has periodically assessed
the programme by comprehensively addressing the components of the curriculum. |
|
|
|
|
7.1.3Q |
The school has periodically assessed
the programme by comprehensively addressing the long-term acquired outcomes. |
|
|
|
|
7.1.4Q |
The l school has periodically asessed
the programme by comprehensively addressing its social accountability. |
|
|
|
|
7.2
Teacher and Student Feedback
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1. Does the
school systematically seek, analyse and respond to teacher and student feedback? Explain.
2. Does the medical school use feedback results for programme development? Comment briefly.
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
7.2.1A |
The school has systematically
sought, analysed and responded to teacher and student feedback. |
|
|
|
|
7.2.1Q |
The school has used feedback
results for programme development. |
|
|
|
|
7.3Performance
of Students and Graduates
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1. Does the school analyse the performance
of cohorts of students and graduates in relation to:
a.
mission and intended learning outcomes? Comment briefly.
b curriculum? Comment briefly.
c. resources provision? Comment
briefly.
2. Does the schoolanalyse the performance
of cohorts of students and graduates in relation to:
a. student background and conditions?
Comment briefly.
b. student entrance qualifications?
Comment briefly.
3. Does the school use the analysis of student performance to provide feedback to the
committees responsible for:
a. student selection? Comment
briefly.
b. curriculum planning? Comment
briefly.
c. student counselling? Comment briefly.
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
7.3.1A |
The school has analysed the
performance of cohorts of students and graduates in relation to mission and intended
learning outcomes. |
|
|
|
|
7.3.2A |
The school has analysed the
performance of cohorts of students and graduates in relation to curriculum. |
|
|
|
|
7.3.3A |
The school has analysed the
performance of cohorts of students and graduates in relation to provision of
resources. |
|
|
|
|
7.3.1Q |
The school has analysed the
performance of cohorts of students and graduates in relation to student background
and conditions. |
|
|
|
|
7.3.2Q |
The school has analysed the
performance of cohorts of students and graduates in relation to student
entrance qualifications. |
|
|
|
|
7.3.3Q |
The school has used the analysis
of student performance to provide feedback to the committees responsible for
student selection. |
|
|
|
|
7.3.4Q |
The school has used the analysis
of student performance to provide feedback to the committees responsible for
curriculum planning. |
|
|
|
|
7.3.5Q |
The school has used the analysis
of student performance to provide feedback to the committees responsible for student
counselling |
|
|
|
|
7.4
Involvement of Stakeholders
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1.
Does the schoolinvolve its principal stakeholders in programme activities,
monitor, and assessment? Explain.
2. Does the schoolallow other stakeholders to access to results of courses and
programme assessment? Explain.
3. Does the schoolseek to get feedback from other stakeholders about the performance
of graduates? Explain.
4. Does the schoolseek to get feedback from other stakeholders about curriculum?
Explain.
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
7.4.1A |
The school involved/shared its
principal stakeholders in the activities of the programme, monitoring it, and
assessing it. |
|
|
|
|
7.4.1Q |
The school has allowed the other
stakeholders to access to results of course and programme evaluation; |
|
|
|
|
7.4.2Q |
The school has sought their feedback
on the performance of graduates. |
|
|
|
|
7.4.3Q |
The school has sought their
feedback on the curriculum. |
|
|
|
|
Standard Eight: Administration
and Governance
8.1. Governance
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this sub-standard:
1. How is the school
governance structure described?
2. Does the school define its functions
including their relationships within the university? Explain.
3. Does the school define in its
governance structures:
a. committees, including committee of curriculum, that
reflect principal stakeholders representation?
b. committees, including committee of curriculum, that
reflect other stakeholders representation ?
4.
How does the school ensure its governance and decisions
transparency?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
8.1.1A |
The has defined its governance
structures and functions including their relationships within the university |
|
|
|
|
8.1.1Q |
The school has set out committees,
including committee of curriculum, and reflect representation from the
principal stakeholders. |
|
|
|
|
8.1.2Q |
The school has set out committees,
including committee of curriculum, and reflect representation for other stakeholders. |
|
|
|
|
8.1.3Q |
The school has ensured
transparency of its governance and decisions. |
|
|
|
|
8.2. Academic Leadership
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this sub-standard:
1. Does the school have a clear line of
responsibility and authority for resourcing curriculum, including a dedicated
educational budget? Mention it.
2. Does the school allocate necessary
resources for implementing curriculum and distributing educational resources as
educationally needed? What are they?
3. Does the school enjoy autonomy to
direct resources, including faculty members remuneration,
in an appropriate manner in order to achieve its intended learning outcomes?
Explain.
4. Does the school take into account the
medical sciences developments and of society health needs when distributing the
resources? Explain.
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
IndicatorAvailability
Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
8.2.1A |
The school has described the
responsibilities of its academic leadership for definition and management of
the medical educational programme. |
|
|
|
|
8.2.1Q |
The school has periodically assessed
its academic leadership in relation to achievement of its mission and
intended learning outcomes.
|
|
|
|
|
8.3. Educational Budget and Resource
Allocation
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1.
Does the school have a
detailed balance? Explain.
2.
Does the school enjoy autonomy to direct resources, giving priority
to educational needs, considering medical sciences developments and society health
needs? Explain.
3.
Does the school have a
financial system, clear documentary course, and a fair transparent remuneration system to define needs and achieve intended learning
outcomes? Explain.
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
8.3.1A |
The school has a clear line of
responsibility and authority for resourcing the curriculum, including a
dedicated educational budget. |
|
|
|
|
8.3.2A |
The school has allocated the
necessary resources for implementing the curriculum and distributing the
educational resources as educationally needs. |
|
|
|
|
8.3.1Q |
The school has autonomy to direct
resources, including faculty members remuneration, in an appropriate manner in order to achieve its
intended learning outcomes. |
|
|
|
|
8.3.2Q |
The school has taken into account
the developments in medical sciences and the health needs of the society when
distributing the resources. |
|
|
|
|
8.4. Administration and Organization
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1.
Does the school have an appropriate administrative and professional/technical staff to
support the implementation of its programme and activities in relation to ensure good management and resources deployment ? Explain.
2.
Does the school formulate and implement an internal programme for quality assurance
of management including a regular review? Explain.
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
8.4.1A |
The school has an appropriate
administrative and professional/technical staff to support the implementation
of its educational programme and activities in relation. |
|
|
|
|
8.4.2A |
The school has ensured good
management and resources deployment |
|
|
|
|
8.4.1Q |
The school has formulated and
implemented an internal programme for quality assurance of the management
including a regular review. |
|
|
|
|
8.5. Constructive Interaction with Health
Sector
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this sub-standard:
1.
Does the school havea constructive collaborations with health sector and related health
sectors of society and government? What are they?
2.
Does the school formalize its collaboration, including engagement of faculty members and students, with partners in the health sector? Explain.
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Assessment
Indicators |
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
8.5.1A |
The school
has a constructive collaboration with the health sector and the related
health sectors of society and government. |
|
|
|
|
8.5.1Q |
The school has formalized its
collaboration, including engagement of staff and students, with partners in
the health sector. |
|
|
|
|
Standard Nine: Continuous Renewal
9.1 Continuous
Renewal
·
Guiding questions to respond
to achievement indicators of this
sub-standard:
1.
Does the school initiate procedures for
regularly reviewing and
updating the process, structure, content, intended
learning outcomes, assessment techniques, and learning environment of the
programme? Explain.
2.
How does the school analyse the performance of cohorts of students
and graduates? What is the result of this analysis in relation to mission and
intended results?
3.
Does the school rectify documented deficiencies? Explain.
4.
Does the school allocate resources for continuous renewal? Explain.
5.
Does the school renew prospective studies and analyses, local
assessment results and medical education literature? Explain.
6.
Does the school ensure renewing,
restructuring, reviewing its policies and practices in
accordance with past experience, current activities and future perspectives?
Explain.
7.
Does the school adapt its mission with scientific, socio-economic
and cultural developments of society? How?
8.
Does the school adjust intended learning outcomes of graduates in
accordance with documented environment
needs, including adjustments in clinical skills, public health
training and patient
care involvement in accordance
with responsibilities encountered upon graduation? Explain.
9.
Does the school adapt curriculum model and instructional methods to be appropriate and relevant? How?
10. Does the school adjust curricular
elements and their relationships to cope with developments in basic biomedical, clinical,
behavioural and social
sciences, changes in demographic profile and health/disease pattern of population, and socioeconomic and
cultural conditions ensuring
involvement of new relevant
knowledge, concepts and methods and discarding of out-dated ones?
Explain.
11. Does the school develop assessment principles, and number and techniques of examinations in accordance with changes in
intended learning outcomes and instructional methods? Explain.
12. Does the school adapt student admission
policy, selection methods and
student intake in accordance
with changes, expectations, circumstances, needs, changes in
premedical education system, and educational programme requirements? Explain.
13. Does the school adapt faculty members recruitment and development
policy in accordance with changing
needs? Explain.
14. Does the school update educational
resources in accordance with changing needs, and student intake? Explain.
15. Does the school refine programme monitoring
and assessment? How?
16.
Does the school develop its organizational structure, governance,
and management to cope with changing circumstances, needs, and stakeholders
'interests accommodation over time? How?
Extent of Sub-Standard Indicators Achievement
No. |
Indicators
|
Indicator
Availability Degree |
|||
Available
|
Partially
Available |
Unavailable |
Notes
|
||
9.1.1A |
As a socially accountable
institution, the school has initiated
procedures for regularly
reviewing and updating
the process, structure,
content, intended learning outcomes, assessment techniques, and learning
environment of the programme. |
|
|
|
|
9.1.2A |
The school has rectified
documented deficiencies. |
|
|
|
|
9.1.3A |
The school has allocated resources
for continuous renewal. |
|
|
|
|
9.1.1Q |
The school has adopted the
process of renewal
on prospective studies
and analyses based
on results of
local assessment and the medical education literature; |
|
|
|
|
9.1.2Q |
The school has ensured that
the process of
renewal and restructuring has led
to the revision
of its policies
and practices in accordance with
past experience, current
activities and future
perspectives. |
|
|
|
|
9.1.3Q |
The school has adapted its mission
statement to the scientific, socio-economic and cultural development of the
society. |
|
|
|
|
9.1.4Q |
The school has adjusted intended
learning outcomes of the graduating students in accordance with documented needs
of the environment they
enter. The adjustment has included clinical skills, public health
training and involvement in
patient care appropriate
to responsibilities encountered upon graduation. |
|
|
|
|
9.1.5Q |
The school has adapted the
curriculum model and
instructional methods to
ensure that these
have been appropriate and relevant. |
|
|
|
|
9.1.6Q |
The school has adjusted curricular
elements and their relationships in keeping with developments in basic
biomedical, clinical, behavioural
and social sciences, changes in
the demographic profile
and health/disease pattern
of the population, and socioeconomic and
cultural conditions. The adjustment has
ensured that new
relevant knowledge, concepts
and methods have been included and out-dated ones discarded;
|
|
|
|
|
9.1.7Q |
The school has developed
assessment principles, and methods
and number of
examinations according to changes in intended learning outcomes and
instructional methods. |
|
|
|
|
9.1.8Q |
The school has adapted student
recruitment policy,
selection methods and
student intake to
changing expectations and circumstances, human resource
needs, changes in the
premedical education system and the requirements of the educational
programme. |
|
|
|
|
9.1.9Q |
The school has adapted faculty
members recruitment and
development policy
according to changing needs. |
|
|
|
|
9.1.10Q |
The school has updated educational
resources according to changing needs, and he student intake; |
|
|
|
|
9.1.11Q |
The school has refined the process
of programme monitoring and assessment. |
|
|
|
|
9.1.12Q |
The school has developed the
organizational structure and of governance and management to cope with
changing circumstances and
needs and, over time, accommodating the
interests of the different groups of stakeholders. |
|
|
|
|