Standards of Programmatic Accreditation

The program accreditation criteria document (special accreditation) contains (8) main criteria, and each criterion included a set of sub-criteria, and the number of sub-criteria reached (42) criteria. Submit them to demonstrate that they have met the standard. The criteria and sub-criteria for program accreditation are as follows:

1. Program mission, objectives and learning outcomes

                   1.1 Academic Program Mission and Objectives

                   2.1 Graduate Specifications

                   3.1 Learning Outcomes of the Academic Program

2. Academic Program and Courses

1.2 Study system.

2.2 Academic Program Specifications.

3.2 Study plan and alignment.

2.4 Description of courses.

2.5 Teaching and Assessment Strategies.

3. Academic Program Management

3.1 Policies, Regulations and Procedures.

3.2 Academic Program Management.

3.3 Admission and Registration Unit.

3.4 Records and files.

3.5 Information systems for the program.

3.6 HR System

4. Faculty members

4.1 Academic map and quorum of faculty members and their assistants.

4.2 Professional development and job stability.

4.3 Academic staff activity

5. Students

5.1 Admission and Registration System.

5.2 Student guidance and support.

5.3 Student Involvement.

5.4 Student Activities.

6. Facilities and facilities of the academic program

6.1 offices.

6.2 Teaching halls.

6.3 Laboratories / Drawing studios.

6.4 Workshops for engineering.

6.5 Library.

6.6 Electronic Resources.

6.7 Educational devices and aids.

6.8 Health unit (health center / clinic).

6.9 Field farms for agriculture.

6.10 Hospitals for medical disciplines.

6.11 Playgrounds, green spaces and water tanks.

6.12 Mosques/praying rooms.

6.13 Toilets and washbasins.

7. Academic program financial resources

7.1 Academic Program Resources and Expenses.

7.2 Program budget.

7.3 The company's accounting system.

8. Quality assurance and continuous improvement

8.1 Development and Quality Assurance Center.

8.2 Self-assessment and program evaluation.

8.3 Evaluation of faculty members.

8.4 Student assessment.

8.5 Continuous improvement plan for the program.